Values are nearly even — within 5% of each other.Updated 10/2/2026
Barner is 24 with a cheap dynasty price, giving you age insulation and optionality if his role grows. Seattle’s TE room is unsettled enough that a competent, improving player can carve out usable weekly routes/targets. At ~96% of Andrews’ SF value, he’s the kind of bet that can gain value quickly if he simply becomes a steady TE2 with spike weeks.
Andrews is still the best bet for immediate, bankable TE production and weekly lineup confidence when healthy. He has a proven ceiling as a primary read in an efficient offense, and that profile is hard to find outside the elite tier. With only a 3.5% value gap, you’re effectively paying almost nothing for the proven difference-maker.
Take Mark Andrews—at this tiny gap, you buy points, weekly floor, and TE ceiling without paying an “elite TE” tax.
Take AJ Barner—age and liquidity matter more than near-term points, and Andrews’ value will decay faster from here.
It’s Andrews if you can use the points this season; otherwise Barner is the better long-horizon bet at near-equal cost.
Worth more?
In a vacuum Andrews is worth more because he’s a proven difference-maker, even if current market values show only a slight edge.
Trade?
If you roster Andrews and aren’t contending, flip him for Barner plus a 2nd (or a solid young WR) rather than taking a near-1:1 swap.
Superflex?
Superflex doesn’t change this much—TE scarcity still favors Andrews for contenders, while rebuilders should prioritize age/insulation with Barner.
See exactly what AJ Barner and Mark Andrews are worth side-by-side in our Trade Calculator.
OPEN TRADE CALCULATORWhat Championship Rosters Have in Common
78.4% had a top-10 RB. The real champion profile from 9,983 rosters.
Stars vs Depth
Champions held 38.3% of value in 3 players. Concentrate, don't spread.
Who Wins Lopsided Trades?
The value "loser" wins titles more often. Don't fear the overpay.
Championship DNA Players
Bijan 23%, Puka 19.3%. The players who keep showing up on title teams.