Mark Andrews holds a 32.1% edge in Superflex dynasty value.Updated 10/2/2026
Helm gives you a ~7-year age advantage at a position where breakouts can come later, making him a clean dynasty hold in rebuild timelines. He’s priced like a developing TE, so any role growth can create outsized value gains versus paying for past production. If your roster isn’t ready to win now, Helm preserves flexibility while you wait for the next usable scoring jump.
Andrews is still the better bet to deliver startable weekly TE scoring in the near term, which is what wins contenders leagues. Even at 30.9, he carries proven ceiling and a clearer path to meaningful target volume than a young, unproven TE. The price gap is only 5.7%, which is a small premium for bankable TE1/TE2 output when chasing a title.
Take Mark Andrews—paying ~5.7% more for near-term reliability at TE is worth it when points matter most.
Take Gunnar Helm—the age insulation and potential value appreciation fit a rebuild better than holding a 31-year-old TE.
If you’re truly on the fence, default to Andrews for 2026 points; default to Helm if you won’t contend until 2027+.
Worth more?
Mark Andrews is worth more right now by price and projection, but Helm can be the better long-term dynasty asset on rebuilding teams.
Trade?
Contenders should try Helm + a small add for Andrews, while rebuilders should flip Andrews for Helm plus a 2nd-ish value buffer.
Superflex?
Superflex doesn’t materially change this TE-vs-TE call—team timeline and TE scoring need should drive the decision.
See exactly what Gunnar Helm and Mark Andrews are worth side-by-side in our Trade Calculator.
OPEN TRADE CALCULATORWhat Championship Rosters Have in Common
78.4% had a top-10 RB. The real champion profile from 9,983 rosters.
Stars vs Depth
Champions held 38.3% of value in 3 players. Concentrate, don't spread.
Who Wins Lopsided Trades?
The value "loser" wins titles more often. Don't fear the overpay.
Championship DNA Players
Bijan 23%, Puka 19.3%. The players who keep showing up on title teams.