The most debated question in Superflex dynasty, answered with 6,976 championship rosters from the 2025 Sleeper season.
39.8% of dynasty champions had a top-5 QB on their roster. That means roughly 6 in 10 champions won without one. But 65.8% had a top-10 QB, and 76.1% had a top-12 QB. The data says: a high-end QB matters. An elite one is a bonus, not a prerequisite.
SUPERFLEX (6,324)
1QB (652)
The SF vs 1QB split is surprisingly close: 39.7% of Superflex champions had a top-5 QB, vs 40.2% in 1QB. The bigger gap is at the top-10 level — 68.7% in 1QB vs 65.5% in SF — suggesting 1QB champions lean slightly harder on QB quality even though the position costs less.
Compare this to running back: 82.5% of all champions had a top-10 dynasty RB. That's the highest correlation of any position at any tier threshold in the dataset. If you're choosing between overpaying for a top-5 QB or a top-5 RB, the data tilts toward the running back.
The takeaway: Don't overpay for a top-5 QB at the expense of your RB and WR rooms. But don't punt QB entirely either — a top-12 quarterback was on 76.1% of championship rosters. The sweet spot is a QB1 who costs less than the premium tier but produces as a weekly top-12 option. Champions were 2-3x more likely to have invested heavily at RB (43.7% had a top-5 RB) than at quarterback.
Do you need a top-5 QB to win in Superflex?
No — 60.3% of Superflex champions won without one. But 65.5% had a top-10 QB, suggesting you need a high-end starter even if not an elite one.
Is QB more important in Superflex or 1QB for winning championships?
The rates are surprisingly similar (39.7% SF vs 40.2% 1QB for top-5 QB). The real difference is at the top-10 tier: 68.7% in 1QB vs 65.5% in SF.
Which position matters most for winning a dynasty championship?
Running back shows the highest correlation — 82.5% of champions had a top-10 RB, compared to 65.8% for QB and 44.3% for TE.
See how your roster stacks up against 6,976 champions.